An alt-center is not moderate—it is alternate—that is, opposed to the discredited establishment. It doesn’t try to be exactly in between, grey, or neutral. It is a synthesis taking the best of different mindsets and ideas to put together the pieces in a way that makes sense.
The alt-right understands that people are not equal and can be categorized quite accurately by race, ethnicity, sex, status, and intelligence. It is hamstrung though by favoring the continuation of a Hobbesian nightmare and tragedy of the commons. Many vanilla republican politicians would readily agree with this stance when it comes to economics and social policy. In this respect, the alt-right is not alternate.
The alt-left understands that you can’t have a real society unless people have a sense of belonging and investment. People cooperate much better if they know there are safety nets if they stumble. It is hamstrung though by failing to understand people vary widely in character and capability. An indiscriminate system of aid quickly degenerates into a tragedy of the commons. The alt left is not alternate in this sense because plenty of the the entrenched technocratic elite share their egalitarian views.
Both alt-right and alt-left retain ideological ties to the conventional platforms they’ve departed from, so in a way of thinking, alt-center, can be thought of as a true-alternate point of view that reaches on both sides and snips the last ties to prevailing political traditions.
On the right, the propaganda of rugged individualism and not taking “handouts” is used to manipulate atomized consumers into letting corporations and wall-street run rampant. The left shrewdly critiqued this view by coining the term “corporate welfare.”
On the left, the shrill politics of victimhood combined with socialist attitudes is a cynical ploy to drain resources from the republican middle and working classes to buy the votes of a teeming underclass that depends on their largesse. The right astutely points out that the leftist elites are trying to “elect a new people” through mass immigration and welfare babies to keep them in power forever.
An alt-center rejects poisonous propaganda positions from both fake sides. It is a complete rejection of the authority of rulers who have long since lost the mandate of heaven through their incompetence and greed, whatever irrelevant side of a made-up spectrum they claim they’re on.
The alt-center recognizes these ideas are just deception used to herd political opinion by parasite-kings and prevent any dangerous(to them) mixtures of ideas from taking place.
Is free healthcare a “left-wing” position when we’re just giving it to members of the tribe we identify with and jealously witholding our wealth from openly-declared blood enemies? What made this stance left-wing is that it was charity without judgment.
Is it “right-wing” to adopt protectionist trade policies when doing away with “free competition” to make sure the newly created jobs go first to people in good standing with the tribe? What made this stance right wing was competition without context.
When we no longer assume an atomized society, to even ask these questions is meaningless. We find ourselves with something different.
Alt-centrism then might be called neo-tribalism, an authoritarian system that maximizes liberties and benefits for cooperators with basic safety nets for all members, generous formal privileges for the best, but treats outgroups as other countries, or within the context of empire as auxiliary associates who are explicitly 2nd class. More important than individuals becoming billionaires would be the ability of society itself to preserve wealth and build assets.
The neo-tribal alt-center understands there is no more nation-state in an age of instant mass communication where hardly anyone farms the land and where we live as semi-nomads drifting from job to job. People, not lines on a map are the territorial borders. Wherever the people set up camp their nation resides in them.