FORWARD BASE B

"Pay my troops no mind; they're just on a fact-finding mission."

Brookings Institute Talk on Russia and America

I attended a talk today at the Brookings Institution about the future of Russian-American relations.

Naturally there was considerable focus on current issues such as Syria and Snowden being given asylum, and how it might affect the upcoming G20 summit.

I didn’t wonder about it much, really.  There’s nothing in Syria that’s central to Russian interests and Snowden, while a nasty diplomatic slap in the face, does nothing to change the larger situation.

I was more interested in bigger political and economic developments and where they might be headed.

Interestingly, the experts pretty much all agreed that the present political order in Russia is dependent on Putin’s cult of personality – that without his influence there would be nothing to hold Russia’s oligarchs together.
And – there is no plan for succession should something happen to Putin tomorrow…

They addressed how Putin’s main objective with his anti-American gestures is to boost his popularity at home.   His anti-American posturing has a huge appeal to his base – Russia’s working classes.
The urban middle and upper middle class has little loyalty to Putin, often protesting him in Moscow and St. Petersburg, so it’s only natural Russia’s ruler tailors his image to the vast majority he relies on.

While Syria is, relatively speaking, a sideshow, the fate of former Soviet republics is not.  Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, among Russia’s first concerns is to bring countries like Ukraine closer to Moscow and prevent them from aligning with Western Europe.

If we look at the numbers, though, it seems to me Russia’s agenda is doomed to fail.

Russia’s entire economy is worth 1.8 trillion.  This is enough to make it one of the world’s bigger economies, but to put Russia’s imperial goals in perspective, Italy’s economy is considerably bigger at 2.2 trillion with 1/3rd the population.

Let’s pretend we are Ukraine for a moment:

Which would we align with:  A 1.8 trillion Russia or a 17 trillion European Union?!

Not to mention, Russia’s economy to this day is based heavily on commodities like natural gas rather than skills or tech.
Indeed, one subject to arise during the question and answer session with the experts was brain drain from Russia…

With no Soviet Union any more that can keep their best talent captive, skilled Russians are increasingly ditching their home country for places like Silicon Valley.  And Russia itself with its feudal oligarchs and powerful crime lords tends to be very unfriendly to commerce.
So long as Russian small businessmen are parasitized by protection rackets and foreign investors are confronted with corruption, their economy is not likely to become truly “modern” any time soon.

A main theme of the talk was to ask what Putin really wants and how to get Russia to work more closely with US objectives.  Even the experts seemed to regard Putin as a mystic, inscrutable, Eastern Czar.
If we look at the numbers, though, it seems clear why the US can’t seem to get Russia to budge.

Relatively speaking, the US really is not that important to Russian interests so it simply doesn’t have that much leverage.
The vast majority of Russia’s foreign trade is with the European Union and with China in a distant second place.   Commerce with the US takes a comparatively puny 4th or 5th place with just a few percent of the total.  Also, the US is just about on the other side of the planet from Russia’s major cities while China and Europe are much more immediate neighbors.
It really shouldn’t come as a surprise that US requests take a back seat compared to more immediate concerns.  What decisive advantage does America offer in exchange for Putin’s cooperation?  Putin is a pragmatist, so clearly what he’s being offered isn’t worth as much as he gets from slighting the US to boost his domestic approval ratings.

The economic reality on the ground is that Russia is already just a big commodity provider for the EU, and thus in every meaningful sense, already part of Europe.
If we look at the facts, Russia as a modern great power, is pure fantasy.

During the talk, there was mention of a new, more Western generation of Russians just waiting for the older oligarchs to die off.  Such a generation is bound to reconcile Russia’s political reality with the economic reality.
Instead of trying to keep states like Ukraine from being sucked into Europe, Russia will itself be sucked into the Euro zone.

Even if Russia somehow remains an aloof oligarchic kleptocracy, it will still be useful for its resources as a lesser partner of Europe.

Graph Russia Trade Partners

2 responses to “Brookings Institute Talk on Russia and America

  1. Moose August 30, 2013 at 1:42 am

    I don’t know that Russia will become a part just like it never has been. For a long time because the Europeans didn’t want them, now that they do however it’s to make them Europeans just like them so they can get some sweetheart deals on the natural resources. Russians, most Eastern Europeans really, don’t play the same Euro-white guilt thing going on in the west.

    Russia wants to be strong but it wants to be Russia, so does Ukraine. Ukraine however knows it can’t be strong if too tightly bound to Russia who has traditionally taken advantage of it. This is why half of Ukraine wants to go one way and the other half the other way. Ukraine would be best served the same as any country and be independent. I don’t envy them though, weaklings to their east and a brute to their northwest.

  2. Eric Patton September 1, 2013 at 9:10 pm

    Obama is setting a precedent here. He seemed to be ready to strike Syria until the UK backed out and he met some resistance back home. Now he’s waiting for all of his ducks to line up while maneuvering troops and collecting a list of potential targets. The Scuds have been hidden and troops are supposedly blending in to the civilian populace. The US is becoming the official enforcer of international law and we have broad powers to interpret that law.

    Our actions toward Syria sends a threatening message to authoritarian collectivist nations that historically have been willing to purge their citizens to enforce the rule of law. This means the end of the sovereignty of the nation-state. That’s strictly bad news for a pragmatic nationalist like Putin.

    We’ve been providing unofficial support to activist dissident groups in their countries, here Putin complains about then Sec. of State Hillary Clinton meddling in Russian politics:

    Whatever replaces them will likely be much more neo-liberal and cosmopolitan than the old guard.

    If you look at opinion polls, the US still has a great deal of allies in the world and Russia has many more enemies than friends:
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/142631/worldwide-leadership-approval.aspx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: