"Pay my troops no mind; they're just on a fact-finding mission."

What Comes Next For the Manosphere

To begin with, what is the manosphere?

What is it that this disparate crowd ranging from worldly pickup artists to celibate shutins have in common?

It can be reduced to a very basic level.

We are the silent dissenters hidden in the crowd for hundreds of generations of civilization always isolated and powerless against an overwhelming majority. We’ve always been dragged along forced to do what everyone else was doing even as we marveled at their lemming-like behavior.
We were that guy who thought “What a stupid, senseless world this is…” his last thought as he joined the crowd in a mad rush over the edge of the trenches and out into no man’s land.
We were the guy who knew that the glory of serving the state was just a waste of life and understood the ‘fair sex’ were as much competitors in a great game with conflicting interests as they were companions.

The internet has changed everything. For the first time in history, we’re able to find one another and communicate on a large scale. No longer can we be isolated like before and beaten into submission by an insane mass society, wasting our lives on everything we know to be wrong and false.

In Mala Fide was an important medium for this new communication. Some might see it being taken down as a bad sign or a sign that the manosphere is going away.
But I think IMF is being taken down because it has served its purpose.
I looked at the dismissive attitudes and complaints of some people when the news first came out.
The number one complaint? “It got too repetitive in its topics. It was getting boring.”
This surprised me a bit at first because it was one of the few sites on the web I could visit and find a community that made sense to me.
But then I understood that this is a sign of progress.

Just a few years ago, the notion of a ‘manosphere’ barely existed. The typical fare on sites like In Mala Fide and Roissy was gritty, rough, revolutionary.
These outrageous views attracted legions of trolls and sparked wars with the sites of those who adhered to the orthodoxy. These were exciting times.
It is telling that this sort of style has lost much of its impact.

For a growing populace this kind of stuff is just tiresome
preaching to the choir.
It’s no longer radical or revolutionary because a critical mass of people now take it for granted as truth.
The orthodox invaders who made writing for shock value so exciting have given up trying to challenge dissent. They’ve been forced to concede the manosphere its right to exist within its territory. The dissenters have won their independence.

Now what do they do with it?

The first phase was simply forming a group consciousness over time through simple observation, shock value, ridicule, and an overall passive-aggressive attitude towards the orthodox order: “enjoy the decline.”
IMF embodied this attitude.
However, passive ridicule and nihilistic indifference is no longer enough.

Over time as more cohesive groups begin to take shape dissenters will begin to see the potential for accomplishing more, maybe even gaining the power to begin changing the world in their favor.

As we move into this second phase of the manosphere, we’ll start to see the formation of tighter, more organized groups with more concrete goals and at least the beginning of serious thought about how to achieve them.

The rebels have finally formed an orthodoxy of their own and we will see them progressively establish themselves as a force to be reckoned with.

-Your Obedient Servant,
Don Giovanni Dannato

3 responses to “What Comes Next For the Manosphere

  1. Giovanni Dannato September 13, 2012 at 9:15 am

    Originally submitted by Stoner with a Boner:

    I’ve tried to define the “manosphere”

    Is it a group of men-well, maybe 90+ percent are male voices but there are female bloggers who comment or would be considered a part such as Sofia…..

    Is it anti-feminism?

    Well, some things stated by MGTOW’s seem parallel to statements made by lesbian separatist feminists. Some things said by Trad Cons-that women are the “fairer sex” parallel statements made by Marcotte and Schwyzer. Even some MRA’s would support a woman’s right to an abortion on the provision that men also had the right to a paper abortion or the right to walk away from children that weren’t genetically theirs w/o obligation. So even though many feminists revel in anger against that manosphere, it would be a mistake to call it “anit-feminist.”

    Obviously, PUA’s, MGTOW’s, MRA and others latching themselves on have different and even contradictory goals….

    The whole idea of a Red Pill/Blue Pill makes no sense since there aren’t even any core tenets….

  2. Jacob Ian Stalk September 13, 2012 at 11:22 am

    Insightful, and hopefully correct.

  3. Pingback: Linkage Is Good For You: Truncated Moving Week | Society of Amateur Gentlemen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: