"Pay my troops no mind; they're just on a fact-finding mission."

EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief

The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.

He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.


Profile of Peter Sutherland

Bilderberg Participants 2011

International Advisory Board member, Eli Lilly & Co

2 responses to “EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief

  1. And Balls June 22, 2012 at 3:34 am

    Why? Does anyone have a real answer to the question of why this is happening and who is behind it? What is the end goal?

    • Eric Patton June 22, 2012 at 4:17 am

      This is a very interesting question, because this attitude of opening borders and encouraging immigration can be seen all over the world. Even in China of all places:

      On the one hand, it gives the large businesses and governments access to cheap, disposable labor. Populist politicians get free votes because the immigrants tend to have little to no education and are very easily to manipulate by promising them handouts. Illegal immigrants also count here, they can vote in elections and get welfare benefits by creating fraudulent identities, the practice varies in effectiveness depending on the jurisdiction (the populists have an invested interest in making sure the illegals can vote). Keeping illegal immigrants out is extremely hard when they have a community of people from their ethnicity and nationality to host them inside of a given nation.

      The downside is that crime, welfare burden and depressed local wages tends to override any benefits from the migration. And once migrants get seated into an area they are pretty much there to stay. Dysgenic trends tend to amplify the problem, stupid people tend to be more fertile:

      Egalitarianism is now the default point of view in most Western societies. This is partially because colleges in many countries now have faculty holding Left-leaning views. It was probably easier to take over the universities and create special departments versus unseating bureaucrats in fields with higher amounts of competition and evidence to assert claims.

      People think human beings are cogs that are replaceable because we are “all equal”. At the same time, any sort of differences in ability or power is counted as being mostly luck or circumstantial, a “privilege”, therefore anyone with privilege should help someone with out it. So an investment in any human is considered to be equal, and an investment in underprivileged humans is considered to be twice as good because you are performing social justice by giving to them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: